solveloddon.org Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the solveloddon.org

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host solveloddon.org. Currently, hosted in United Kingdom and its service provider is Webfusion Internet Solutions .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache/2.0.55 (Ubuntu) mod_python/3.1.4 Python/2.4.3 PHP/5.1.2 mod_ssl/2.0.55 OpenSSL/0.9.8a mod_perl/2.0.2 Perl/v5.8.7 containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

-- home news articles letters search help us stop the construction of 3000 houses what can you do? start here welcome to solve. help today by registering with us and signing the petition . planning inspector report - good news friday, april 22 2016 @ 02:16 pm bst contributed by: peter bloyce inspector finds the local plan sound. good news for the loddon valley the planning inspector has accepted the basingstoke and deane local plan as sound. he agreed the council figure of 850 houses per annum and did not suggest any further greenfield sites. the news for old basing and lychpit is very good. the inspector does show an awareness of all the fears solve and so many others have expressed, particularly over water quality, biodiversity, the special significance of the loddon valley, the need for mitigating measures to be undertaken and the need for careful monitoring to identify problems before they occur. nevertheless, he has approved the first development in the valley despite all the representations so many of us have submitted. so it is understandable that some people continue to be sceptical. lodge farm, poors farm and hodds farm, sites in the loddon valley, were put forward as omission sites by taylor wimpey in an attempt to get this area developed. however, the inspector considered that these sites were not suitable or sustainable on several grounds. he repeated that the environment agency has objected on the grounds of flood risk and impact on the river loddon and associated wetlands on biodiversity grounds. he also cast doubt on the future viability of all these sites beyond this local plan, after 2029, saying some representations hint at the possibility of these sites being brought forward beyond the plan period. even then, i envisage major infrastructural work, on the assumption that the impact on the biodiversity of the loddon valley can be mitigated to an acceptable standard, although it is difficult to see at this point in time how this could be achieved. he was concerned about the east of basingstoke (pyotts hill) site, scheduled for 450 houses, and redlands farm, scheduled for 165 houses, regarding noise and odour pollution. the inspector said that policies ss3.7 (redlands farm) and ss3.9 (pyotts hill) require the preparation of comprehensive noise and odour studies in conjunction with the utility provider, which would form the layout decisions. in reply to those who thought that the housing allocations were skewed towards the west and south-west the inspector echoed our views by saying - a significant proportion of recent growth in the town of basingstoke, until the start of the plan period, has been to the north and north-east of the urban area. from this perspective, the change in emphasis to the south-west and west is no more than counterbalancing the previous growth trend in the town. solve would like to thank all our supporters who contributed in any way to our campaign to save the loddon valley from inappropriate development. a special thank you our local borough councillors, sven godesen, onnalee cubitt and clive pinder (also founder member of solve.). we have come a long way since the original threat to build 9,000 houses across the loddon valley. solve will continue to work with our local councillors as the plans for the east of basingstoke site emerge. this report from the planning inspector adds further to our armoury in defence of the loddon valley. nevertheless there is a lot to watch out for, such as monitoring the river water quality, flood risk, protection of the biodiversity and chalk stream environment and noise and odour pollution. these problems will not go away and we need to hold the council planners and developers to account. the inspectors report can be found on the bdbc website at http://www.basingstoke.gov.uk/planningpolicy it is proposed that the borough council will seek adoption of the basingstoke and deane local plan 2011 to 2029 at the meeting of full council on 26 may 2016. peter bloyce solve comments (0) solve february 2016 friday, february 05 2016 @ 05:29 pm gmt contributed by: peter bloyce local plan consultation basingstoke and deane borough council (bdbc) launched what is hoped to be the last public consultation on the emerging local plan on 21st december. the closing date for comments is 4pm on monday 8th february. as with previous consultations, comments must be confined to, as the council notice states:- only those representations that refer to a specific change or supporting document, that are made in writing, and are received by the council within the consultation period will be considered. the relevant documents and details of how to respond can be found on the councils website at http://www.basingstoke.gov.uk/localplanmods . all the documents are available for public inspection at basingstoke and deane borough council offices, london road during normal opening hours. they will also be available for inspection at all public libraries in the borough. the inspectors final report is still expected in march 2016. it will be up to the planning inspector to set out his conclusions on the housing assessment. the changes proposed by the council, largely at the instigation of the inspector, do not significantly change the local plan housing strategy. solve is therefore hopeful that the inspector will accept the local plan housing numbers and sites. we can then move on and once the plan is approved solve will be working with local councillors in order to monitor the actions of bdbc and developers. solve is very aware that the hart local plan is proposing 730 houses to the west of hook, very close to the village of newnham, posing yet another threat to the countryside. peter bloyce comments (0) november/december 2015 thursday, november 26 2015 @ 11:28 am gmt contributed by: peter bloyce bdbc local plan hearing the local plan hearings have now ended and the inspector is considering all of the evidence put to him, both verbally and in writing. the timetable includes a public consultation period to be conducted by the council on modifications to the plan. the council will process the submissions which will be sent to the inspector for his consideration before his final report is published in march 2016. the final report will set out the inspectors conclusions on the overall assessment of housing need and all other matters discussed during the public hearings. at the hearing session on spatial strategy and housing need the developers and the house builders federation pressed for more housing. all of them appeared to use the same highly selective evidence paying scant regard to things that matter to most residents such as the environment and infrastructure. developers pressed for more houses at every opportunity during the hearings. im sure that the inspector has heard it all before. many participants argued the case for more small sites which they said would speed up deliverability. several questioned the zero allocation for tadley, something that both solve and countrywatch have highlighted before. however, the council, after taking advice from the office for nuclear regulation (onr), has since recommended that sites near the awe should not be put in the plan but can be considered on their merits during planning applications. the number of housing allocations in the south west (sw) of the town compared to the north east (ne) has been a constant gripe from the south west action group (swag) trying to reduce housing in the south west. this was supported by taylor wimpey as they look to develop across the loddon valley. in response to this, with its often misleading information, cllr godesen wrote to the inspector pointing out that housing has been focused around the ne of the town in recent years. solve backed this up by showing that there has been 3 times as many houses built in the ne of the borough as in the south west since 1991. evidence produced by objectors highlighted the problems associated with the si

URL analysis for solveloddon.org

http://www.solveloddon.org/staticpages/index.php?page=20101114011008491
http://www.solveloddon.org/article.php?story=20150303122552695
http://www.solveloddon.org/article.php?story=20130826171355713
http://www.solveloddon.org/article.php?story=20121126160451185
http://www.solveloddon.org/article.php?story=20150704114350278
http://www.solveloddon.org/article.php?story=20130507122633962
http://www.solveloddon.org/article.php?story=20131225103858183
http://www.solveloddon.org/article.php?story=20140823122645913
http://www.solveloddon.org/article.php?story=201404131038332
http://www.solveloddon.org/staticpages/index.php?page=20120216235337401
http://www.solveloddon.org/users.php?mode=profile&uid=17
http://www.solveloddon.org/submit.php?type=story
http://www.solveloddon.org/index.php?page=5
http://www.solveloddon.org/staticpages/index.php?page=20101114003609194
http://www.solveloddon.org/admin
basingstoke.gov.uk
cpre.org.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

WHOIS LIMIT EXCEEDED - SEE WWW.PIR.ORG/WHOIS FOR DETAILS

  REFERRER http://www.pir.org/

  REGISTRAR Public Interest Registry

SERVERS

  SERVER org.whois-servers.net

  ARGS solveloddon.org

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

  REGISTERED unknown

DOMAIN

  NAME solveloddon.org

NSERVER

  NS67.1AND1.CO.UK 217.160.80.173

  NS68.1AND1.CO.UK 217.160.81.173

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .